Will's podcast series was split up into three installments:
- Episode One: Villanueva's personal and scholarly background
- Episode Two: Villanueva's principles, theories, and pedagogy
- Episode Three: Villanueva's impact on the field
One thing that I learned listening to the podcasts from purely a production standpoint is that there must be a ton of work that goes into talking for ten minute installments. Will designed an icon/logo for his series (which turned out great!), made a theme song/intro, and kept his audio clean (no background noise, his delivery was clear and rehearsed and didn't seem to be overly scripted), and for a (I assume) unfinanced project there was definite #ProductionQuality. I imagine that it's no easy task to try and sum up a scholar's entire body of work in roughly 30 minutes, especially someone who has been as Prolific™ as Victor Villanueva.
Episode One: Background
One thing I appreciated about Will's podcast was how he chose to frame it. The language he used was accessible, aware of a potential audience of new graduate students to the field. It was introductory in the best way, didn't rely on heavy jargon, and as someone with no background on Villanueva I was able to follow the content without any obstacles. I think Will's delivery works on a meta level too, as he goes on in Episodes 2 & 3 to discuss English(es), and the importance of having students bring their environments in to the academic conversation.
Episode One mainly focused on Villanueva's personal background, his career history/awards, and a brief overview of his main research areas. I learned that Villanueva's research is geared toward a more social epistemology, inclusive of multiple backgrounds and perspectives, as well as one that is non-Western focused. Villanueva also studies race and racism, particularly their relation to and within the academy.
Episode Two: Theories/Pedagogy/Principles
Episode Two opens with a recording of Villanueva, which I thought was an awesome touch, and helped humanize him. There was a lot of content in episode two, so I'm just going to share the bullet point notes I took while I was listening on Villanueva's perspectives:
- Colorblind racism ("I don't see color...") = oppression through disregarding/silencing the differences of life experiences for people of non-white races
- Literacy should connect to life backgrounds
- Uses the example of a near-illiterate football player to highlight diversity of education levels when coming in to the composition classroom as well as the power of external motivation
- Writing should bring in the personal to the political
- The world/social environments are not static
- Will places Villanueva in the same school of scholars as Gloria Anzaldua, Antonio Gramsci, Paolo Freire, among others
- Education should be used to better sociey
- "Knowing where we come from can help us know where we are going"
- We should critically engage with the world through writing
- Use personal backgrounds/experiences/cultures to educate, having more than one English (Englishes)
- Critical consciousness allows us to engage with the world in a transformative way
Episode Three: Impact in the field
- In the recording Villanueva regards the use of "Developmental" as an insult, which I dug
- Reiterates the importance of understanding English in the plural
- Students should be allowed to have their own dialects in the classroom
- Villanueva's school of comp theory started gaining traction in the 90s
- We should combat racism and society in critical ways
- We should also knock it off with "stupid ass infighting" and "oppression olympics"
Overall, I think Will did a fantastic job. Victor Villanueva's pedagogy is very similar to what I believe in, and as someone who has read a lot of Gramsci, I was excited to find another scholar to read up on. Thanks Will!
You've received a lot of comments, yourself, in others' blog posts. Nice analysis or note-taking with these bulleted points. Useful content and information!
ReplyDeleteYou might enjoy reading Irv Peckham on post-process thinking. He just posted his thoughts on PPT in his blog. Reminds me of something we've been talking in class this past week: writing should be engaging for students (and for teachers) in order to maximize learning. http://personalwriting2.blogspot.com/2015/10/post-process-writing.html
ReplyDeleteAwesome, thanks for the suggestion!
Delete